Railroad Forums 

  • Anarchy in Daveyton, S.A.

  • Discussion about railroad topics everywhere outside of Canada and the United States.
Discussion about railroad topics everywhere outside of Canada and the United States.

Moderators: Komachi, David Benton

 #1374059  by johnthefireman
 
philipmartin wrote:commuters at Daveyton say "no train? we don't need this station," and set the station on fire. The material in quotes is from my imagination, but it fits the story.
I think it's rather more complex than that rather flip comment. After the best part of 400 years in which the majority population had no sense of ownership of public property, which all belonged to the white minority, and after a liberation struggle in which public (ie white-controlled) property was a legitimate target of the frustration of the oppressed majority, I think it will take more than one generation before a sense of public ownership is instilled in people. The railways in particular were a white- and indeed Afrikaans-dominated industry, and contributed significantly to the apartheid policy of migrant labour, so it's no great surprise that there is no love lost between the people and the railways.
 #1374078  by philipmartin
 
johnthefireman wrote:
philipmartin wrote:commuters at Daveyton say "no train? we don't need this station," and set the station on fire. The material in quotes is from my imagination, but it fits the story.
I think it's rather more complex than that rather flip comment. After the best part of 400 years in which the majority population had no sense of ownership of public property, which all belonged to the white minority, and after a liberation struggle in which public (ie white-controlled) property was a legitimate target of the frustration of the oppressed majority, I think it will take more than one generation before a sense of public ownership is instilled in people. The railways in particular were a white- and indeed Afrikaans-dominated industry, and contributed significantly to the apartheid policy of migrant labour, so it's no great surprise that there is no love lost between the people and the railways.
Flip comment #2. Civilized people don't burn down the station because the train is late.
 #1374132  by philipmartin
 
johnthefireman wrote:I don't think you understood what I wrote. It is not about the train being late.
Railwaya Africa said "Commuters waiting at Daveyton, angered by the delay, set fire to the station,"
You say they set fire to the station for various psycological reasons, which I don't buy; and which don't justify arson.
 #1374166  by johnthefireman
 
I actually said, "it's rather more complex than that rather flip comment", and I didn't mention "various psychological reasons", although I did mention the historical background, which is different, for example, from that of people who have experienced hundreds of years of freedom and democracy rather than hundreds of years of discrimination and oppression. To use your own term, "civilised people" don't impose minority rule, oppression, violence, discrimination, exploitation, etc on the majority of the people, culminating in formal apartheid, and when an uncivilised minority do so, the consequences are unpredictable to say the least. To then accuse the victims of that sort of uncivilised behaviour of themselves being uncivilised seems a trifle unfair.

But we stray off topic. I have made my point, for those who are interested in taking a broader view of this topic.
 #1374178  by johnthefireman
 
As I say, I have made my point and don't wish to continue off-topic. If you think it is comical, I would suggest that you are taking a very narrow view and that you know little of the context. Let the reader judge for her/himself.
 #1374212  by george matthews
 
philipmartin wrote:
johnthefireman wrote:
philipmartin wrote:commuters at Daveyton say "no train? we don't need this station," and set the station on fire. The material in quotes is from my imagination, but it fits the story.
I think it's rather more complex than that rather flip comment. After the best part of 400 years in which the majority population had no sense of ownership of public property, which all belonged to the white minority, and after a liberation struggle in which public (ie white-controlled) property was a legitimate target of the frustration of the oppressed majority, I think it will take more than one generation before a sense of public ownership is instilled in people. The railways in particular were a white- and indeed Afrikaans-dominated industry, and contributed significantly to the apartheid policy of migrant labour, so it's no great surprise that there is no love lost between the people and the railways.
Flip comment #2. Civilized people don't burn down the station because the train is late.
You constantly show that you have not the smallest understanding of the situations in Africa. Pay more attention to your own problems - the rise of a loud Neo-Nazi candidate for one of your major parties.
 #1374219  by philipmartin
 
george matthews wrote: Pay more attention to your own problems - the rise of a loud Neo-Nazi candidate for one of your major parties.
Ha ha ha ha! :-D.

Sorry to be rude, George. That was my first reaction to your post. I hope that we are all friends here.
 #1374306  by philipmartin
 
Here's an article, "Prasa warns against torching of trains. http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/ ... ns-1989529" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A similar story from the African News Agency. http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/ ... es-1989233" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Third article: Protesters threaten to burn Gautrains. From the article: “It would be useless for us to burn our own property, but that Gautrain is not for us, it's for the rich people. It is for the bourgeois,” Mokoena said to cheers of approval from the crowd."
http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/ ... ns-1485773" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Photo: Pretoria station.