Railroad Forums 

  • Phil Anschutz sale of the SP

  • Pertaining to all railroad subjects, past and present, in the American West, including California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming, Montana, and The Dakotas. For specific railroad topics, please see the Fallen Flags and Active Railroads categories.
Pertaining to all railroad subjects, past and present, in the American West, including California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming, Montana, and The Dakotas. For specific railroad topics, please see the Fallen Flags and Active Railroads categories.

Moderator: Komachi

 #1191316  by CPF363
 
Looking back to the mid 1990s, did Phil Anschutz make the right decision to sell the Southern Pacific (SP, D&RGW and SSW) to the Union Pacific Railroad? Was staying independent ever a consideration of SP management, KCS has been successful without merging, could this had been a viable option? Could Anschutz have sold out to someone such as Warren Buffett who could have provided investment capital into the system? Could the KCS have been a suitable owner? Should SP management, during deliberations of the BNSF merger, negotiated for some viable lines to further enhance the system verses trackage rights, e.g. Chicago-Kansas City, Denver-Kansas City, Pueblo-Dallas and access into the Powder River Basin for example? Say UP was able to merge with the Santa Fe, would a SP-BN merger had been a better fit for the SP than the UP?