Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter Rail

Pertaining to all railroading subjects, past and present, in New England

Moderators: MEC407, NHN503

Post Reply
Scalziand
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 8:28 pm
Location: Naugatuck

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by Scalziand » Thu Sep 17, 2015 3:10 pm

Scammer or not, the WRA is hosting a presentation from BSR about the proposed service tomorrow at 8AM in Worcester Union Station.

City Hall Notebook: Worcester-Providence train service on WRA agenda
http://www.telegram.com/article/2015091 ... 4/0/SEARCH" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

BM1575
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 11:50 am
Location: Rhode Island

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by BM1575 » Sun Sep 27, 2015 2:09 pm

Well from what I've heard thru thru the vines of grape they're using 2-3 FL9's that were purchased from Metro North as for passenger cars? I'll assume they will be hand me down seconds that are out dated as well. The line will start in Providence thru P&W's valley main all the way up to Worcester. P&W even built a stub track long enough to park equipment right after Mendon Rd but unsure of what will be parked there but It's long enough for 6 passenger cars and 1 engine. But like most it's lots of talk nothing is in stone as of yet.

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: MP 67.2 Georgia Southern Railway

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by Jeff Smith » Sun Sep 27, 2015 3:34 pm

Source? I don't think any of these unit are in any condition to be resurrected, and there are much better choices out there.
Next stop, Willoughby
~Jeff Smith (fka "Sarge") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

BM1575
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 11:50 am
Location: Rhode Island

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by BM1575 » Sun Sep 27, 2015 5:58 pm

Jeff the source I heard this from Is pretty credible seeing they work for the railroad. It don't matter to me what they run It would've been nice to see FL9's but I guess that's only tourist railroad dreaming I'm having.

Jeff Smith
Site Admin
Posts: 8484
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:28 am
Location: MP 67.2 Georgia Southern Railway

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by Jeff Smith » Sun Sep 27, 2015 6:12 pm

I think someone is pulling your leg. These units were on their last legs as it was, restricted to shuttle service and often two to a "mini" (3-coach consist). And they don't have ACSES and they might need environmental waivers. I don't recall what MNRR did with their units, but they have only one F10 on property, and they're holding that for a museum I think. CtDOT still has five units I think? And they've been stripped in the NH yard, sitting rusting away. CtDOT did try to sell them; no takers. If there's a contract on any of the units, they'd be out there.

Now, there are operational FL9's elsewhere, including one on Maine Eastern, and one on the Naugatuck. The ME one could be for sale; there was an operator/ownership change and the new owner is not interested in passenger ops. Naugy would never let their's go. Danbury has some static displays that are probably intact, but again, I doubt a museum would let one go.

It's just not practical.
Next stop, Willoughby
~Jeff Smith (fka "Sarge") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner

NH2060
Posts: 1516
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:44 pm

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by NH2060 » Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:52 pm

Well I suppose if you had 2 FL9s bracketing 2-4 coaches making only one stop between PVD and WOR they shouldn't have a problem performance wise. It's not even as stop and go as the Upper Harlem, Danbury, and Waterbury shuttles.

Now what does sound truly ridiculous is this:
If a successful profit is made in Worcester, the company should be able to expand to larger markets around Boston and Manhattan.
http://www.masslive.com/news/worcester/ ... y_com.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Yeah right :-P

User avatar
Rockingham Racer
Posts: 3481
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by Rockingham Racer » Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:32 pm

"Bono's company will be the first private commuter railway to start in this country in 100 years, he noted."

I'm fairly certain All Aboard Florida pre-dated this guy. And to F-Line's observation and his wonderment: where in Providence are the trains going to land? Maybe a facility on P&W's property? These are truly exciting times we live in!

User avatar
YamaOfParadise
Posts: 386
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:36 pm
Location: Middlesex County, Connecticut

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by YamaOfParadise » Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:44 pm

Not to mention how this operation could/would comply with the PTC mandates that are coming up. Regardless if it gets pushed off for x number of years or not, that's still going to significantly increase the cost of this project for him AND the P&W.
Consider contributing detailed railway data to OpenStreetMap for use in OpenRailwayMap!

F-line to Dudley via Park
Posts: 7355
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:26 pm
Location: North Cambridge

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by F-line to Dudley via Park » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:03 pm

Rockingham Racer wrote:"Bono's company will be the first private commuter railway to start in this country in 100 years, he noted."

I'm fairly certain All Aboard Florida pre-dated this guy. And to F-Line's observation and his wonderment: where in Providence are the trains going to land? Maybe a facility on P&W's property? These are truly exciting times we live in!
Can't be Amtrak-owned Providence station, that's for sure. Not unless they want to pay Amtrak's price for rent, equip for PTC, and get qualified on the NEC. The P&W-dispatched FRIP track has no possible platform access at Providence.

So give a warm welcome to historic Harris Ave. Union Station, the 100% Amtrak-free downtown Providence stop! Make sure to steer clear of the broken glass when exiting the train, and remember to always walk in pairs after dark.

mtuandrew
Posts: 5859
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:59 am
Location: the Manassas Gap Independent Line

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by mtuandrew » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:32 pm

How's that work? Isn't that on Amtrak track?

User avatar
YamaOfParadise
Posts: 386
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:36 pm
Location: Middlesex County, Connecticut

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by YamaOfParadise » Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:48 pm

mtuandrew wrote:How's that work? Isn't that on Amtrak track?
That's the point; it isn't. If you look at Boston Switch, it's milepost 04.90 on the P&W Mainline... if you do some math to compare the milepost of Boston Switch on the Shore Line (190.0), and subtract 4.90 miles from that, you get to Brayton interlocking at MP 185.10 on the Shore Line. That's just south (physically west) of the station. That's not Atwells, but I think at some point it did end a little further southbound at Atwells; Brayton just was reconfigured at some point and now if you were to continue to Atwells you'd still have to temporarily merge into track 3 before coming back out. So I don't even think what F-Line said would "work" from the perspective of exclusively operating on the P&W.
Consider contributing detailed railway data to OpenStreetMap for use in OpenRailwayMap!

User avatar
Rockingham Racer
Posts: 3481
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by Rockingham Racer » Wed Sep 30, 2015 5:34 am

This is sounding less and less plausible as time passes.....still exciting times, though!

bostontrainguy
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:14 am

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by bostontrainguy » Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:32 am

I hate the name.

jmar896
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 4:02 pm

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by jmar896 » Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:20 am

Jeff Smith wrote:I think someone is pulling your leg. These units were on their last legs as it was, restricted to shuttle service and often two to a "mini" (3-coach consist). And they don't have ACSES and they might need environmental waivers. I don't recall what MNRR did with their units, but they have only one F10 on property, and they're holding that for a museum I think. CtDOT still has five units I think? And they've been stripped in the NH yard, sitting rusting away. CtDOT did try to sell them; no takers. If there's a contract on any of the units, they'd be out there.

Now, there are operational FL9's elsewhere, including one on Maine Eastern, and one on the Naugatuck. The ME one could be for sale; there was an operator/ownership change and the new owner is not interested in passenger ops. Naugy would never let their's go. Danbury has some static displays that are probably intact, but again, I doubt a museum would let one go.

It's just not practical.
I know Im a little late to the party but Maine Eastern has 2 FL9s, 488 & 489. I believe they are both operational, as they were both operating very recently. They pull a 5 car consist without problems. Although I agree that FL9s are fairly unrealistic they are one of few options. Sure, there's GP40s and F40s available but quite honestly the FL9s are not much worse. There were 2 FL9s for lease in MN livery about a year ago. As long as they stay off of Amtrak track cant they get away with no ACSES? I think that's going to be there plan in the end. As for coaches, the MBTA should be willing to sell some of there older stored MBB coaches and cabs. There's also a good number of Comets from NJT and older bi-levels floating around. The MBTA MBBs would make the most sense though when it comes to cost and transport costs. As for environmental wavier there not much worse then the tier 0 locomotives out there. There's still plenty of 567s out there, so I don't think a FL9 would need a waiver.

As much as an unrealistic proposal BSR is making I do hope a Worcester-Woonsocket-Providence commuter rail gets established soon. There's a pretty large number of people who commute from the Worcester area to the Providence & Woonsocket areas, I think there's a market for one.

lakest101
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 8:18 pm
Location: Worcester, MA

Re: Boston Surface Railroad: Worcester-Providence Commuter R

Post by lakest101 » Sat Oct 17, 2015 7:29 pm

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/236.1019" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

49 CFR 236.1019.c.2.i-ii

Looks like they won't need PTC

Post Reply

Return to “New England Railfan”