Something that railfans and bike path enthusiasts might want to pay attention to. A case regarding railbanking has made it to the supreme court and will be ruled on.
I receive surveying journal updates and first became aware of this a few weeks ago. The issue is whether property owners are owed compensation when a government builds a trail within a railbanked right of way on private property.
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/ca ... ed-states/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/10/02/61672.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I receive surveying journal updates and first became aware of this a few weeks ago. The issue is whether property owners are owed compensation when a government builds a trail within a railbanked right of way on private property.
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/ca ... ed-states/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/10/02/61672.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will take up the question of whether the United States retains an interest in rights-of-way after the underlying lands were patented into private ownership.Basically, the supreme court is going to decide whether or not the easement for the abandoned railroad right of way should be extinguished, with ownership of the land returning to Brandt Revocable Trust, the owners of the land around the right of way. They will also determine whether or not the government owes compensation to Brandt Revocable Trust if the easement is not extinguished.