P&W has abandoned it's request for a waiver on adverse abandonment proceedings. I am unsure as to whether or not this means they are abandoning the proceedings themselves, or just the expeditied process?
http://www.stb.dot.gov/decisions/readin ... enDocument
By petition filed on September 15, 2010,[1] Providence and Worcester Railroad Company (P&W), a Class II railroad, sought exemptions from certain statutory provisions and waivers of certain Board regulations in connection with its intent to seek a third-party or “adverse” abandonment of a 12.8-mile portion of the Danbury Secondary Line, extending between milepost 92.0 near Newtown in Fairfield County and milepost 104.8 in Derby in New Haven County, Conn. (the Line). Housatonic Railroad Company, Inc. (Housatonic), the owner of the Danbury Secondary Line, filed a reply on October 8, 2010.
The Danbury Secondary Line extends 33.6 miles between milepost 104.8 in Derby, where it connects with the Connecticut Department of Transportation’s (CDOT) Waterbury Branch, and milepost 71.2 at the New York State line near Danbury, where it connects with Metro North Commuter Railroad’s (Metro North) Beacon Line. P&W has overhead trackage rights on approximately 28 miles of the Danbury Secondary Line between milepost 104.80 in Derby and milepost 76.9 in Danbury. [2]
P&W filed the petition for waivers and exemptions because Housatonic had allegedly placed the Line out of service and CDOT had announced its intention to schedule outages for track rehabilitation over the alternate route P&W was using to serve the Danbury shipper. P&W has trackage rights over the alternative route but claimed that the outages would occur during its usual operating hours, effectively precluding it from serving the Danbury customer.
On June 16, 2011, P&W filed a motion to withdraw the petition for waivers and exemptions without prejudice, asserting that no parties will be prejudiced. P&W states that it is not necessary and it does not intend to file an adverse abandonment application at this time because it has been able to serve the Danbury shipper using the time windows CDOT has made available.
It seems to me the waiver was to speed the process in case they couldn't serve the customer at reasonable times. However, do they still want the line? Here's a link to the PDF document:
http://www.stb.dot.gov/filings/all.nsf/ ... 230113.PDF
3. In the intervening period of time since the Petition for Waiver was filed, P&W has been able to provide service to the involved shipper during certain windows that the CDOT has made available. Consequently, while P&W still prefers to able to use the more direct HRRC routing to serve this customer using its trackage rights, it is not necessary at the present time to use the Board's resources to ensure that P&W will be able to continue providing service to the shipper.'
4. As the Board has not yet acted on P&W's Petition for Waiver, and as P&W does not at this time intend to file an adverse abandonment application, no parties will be prejudiced by the withdrawal of that petition.
It's paragraph 4 that seems to indicate they will not pursue adverse possession at all. Still, I'd think they'd want to force HRRC to fix the track.
What a shame this portion of the former Maybrook has turned into this.