Railroad Forums 

  • Search

  • Search it up!

Search found 5858 matches

 Return to the advanced search

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Mon Apr 15, 2024 3:43 pm ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

There is around double that in T&E on the former ST/PAR.

Re: The Stony Brook Branch

 by newpylong ¦  Thu Apr 11, 2024 1:11 pm ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: The Stony Brook Branch ¦  Replies: 218 ¦  Views: 52937

It's an interesting position - almost like an hourly Trainmaster.

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Wed Apr 10, 2024 3:21 pm ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

That's a common train size with Jay being gone. Still decent tonnage for one customer each way.

Re: Activity on the Mountain Branch (Portland to Westbrook)

 by newpylong ¦  Wed Apr 10, 2024 7:05 am ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: Activity on the Mountain Branch (Portland to Westbrook) ¦  Replies: 239 ¦  Views: 112370

Since the track is still in service afaik up to the inbound lead maybe they were just testing the entirety of the branch.

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Tue Apr 09, 2024 11:57 am ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

This is the area I was talking about. What are they going to put way up there? https://youtu.be/pFu3KjEBF34?t=388

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:55 am ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

That big swath up on the hill on the right on that guy's video as he walks also made me suspect it wasn't railroad (or all RR) related. That land is likely not even owned by the RR and would not benefit a couple of extended tracks in any way.

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Mon Apr 08, 2024 6:35 pm ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

If they moved cars that way NS would get a cut, they won't do that. If they need to extend beyond the two train pairs they'll renegotiate with NS to run more over PAS. PAS is always going to need something that CSX could pay for.

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Mon Apr 08, 2024 4:36 pm ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

Pretty sure the agreement was for 2 train pairs across PAS before they would need to come up with another agreement so they can get another pair through there.

I don't think they would be clearing south of Military Road (Route 2) south of Winn. That's way down by MP 4 in DCS, seems pretty far south.

Re: New freight customer on Amtrak Springfield line?

 by newpylong ¦  Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:06 pm ¦  Forum: New England Railfan ¦  Topic: New freight customer on Amtrak Springfield line? ¦  Replies: 5 ¦  Views: 1162

Keep it mind these moves may involve Amtrak but they don't get a cut of the waybill. So they would either be dealing with a one originating and one terminating railroad or a single if the P&W does the whole thing.

Re: Twin State Railroad

 by newpylong ¦  Mon Apr 08, 2024 3:00 pm ¦  Forum: New England Railfan ¦  Topic: Twin State Railroad ¦  Replies: 171 ¦  Views: 30426

I think the reality of the situation is, a trail is a much better use of a corridor if there is 0% chance of service being re-established than sitting there to mother nature. Here in the Upper Valley of NH, the Northern rail trail gets an incredible amount of use and the towns it connects are pretty...

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Sun Apr 07, 2024 6:44 pm ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

Not an answer anyone here has but likely when it makes more financial sense for them to do that than reduce tonnage.

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Sun Apr 07, 2024 6:20 am ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

I was referring to the bystander not sharing their evidence.

As for the defoliants, that is not done by water sources. If you look trackside there are markers where the weed sprayer must stop nearing water.

Re: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings)

 by newpylong ¦  Sat Apr 06, 2024 6:16 am ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: "Up North" Gawking (District 1 sightings) ¦  Replies: 2608 ¦  Views: 536607

Not cool.

Re: CSX Track Upgrades & Infrastructure of Pan Am

 by newpylong ¦  Fri Apr 05, 2024 6:22 pm ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: CSX Track Upgrades & Infrastructure of Pan Am ¦  Replies: 871 ¦  Views: 158254

Define passing track. Do you mean the #2 main?

Re: Pan Am Worcester Main Line

 by newpylong ¦  Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:49 pm ¦  Forum: Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System) ¦  Topic: Pan Am Worcester Main Line ¦  Replies: 830 ¦  Views: 184995

That's what it looked like to me too.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 391