Railroad Forums
Moderators: lensovet, Kaback9, nick11a
ApproachMedium wrote:Says who?ns obviously
ApproachMedium wrote:Says who?The MTA press release from last year. I'll post it when I find it.
ns3010 wrote:The rebuilds will come back with 2,500 gallon tanks.Nope. They are in the bulletin order with 1800 galllon tanks. Would have been nice though.
morris&essex4ever wrote:NS has nothing to do with these rebuilds.ApproachMedium wrote:Says who?ns obviously
sullivan1985 wrote:Hence the after my post.morris&essex4ever wrote:NS has nothing to do with these rebuilds.ApproachMedium wrote:Says who?ns obviously
cnj1524 wrote:Dont some of the cat rebuilds already have 2500 gal tanks? And as to the MN rebuilds(NJT's F40 cats)well have there been any pics yet?The ex-Amtrak F40's that MNRR rebuilt came back with 2500 gallon tanks. The only NJT CAT rebuilt to come back with a 2500 gallon tank was the 4113. All the rest had 1500.
I do know when it goes from prints to final product things really change so until We see them we wont know,but why is NJT not choosing
to lease these units out vs keeping them,I just dont get it and dont tell me cost efective because every engine they have leased or sold
are still in service
morris&essex4ever wrote:So essentially, you can write whatever nonsense you want and as long as you follow it with a smiley, it must be accepted by the board as cute and not ridiculous?sullivan1985 wrote:Hence the after my post.morris&essex4ever wrote:NS has nothing to do with these rebuilds.
ns obviously
cruiser939 wrote: So essentially, you can write whatever nonsense you want and as long as you follow it with a smiley, it must be accepted by the board as cute and not ridiculous?I don't get how it was nonsense.