by Acourtrail
The various disccussions about the D&H has got me wondering. What if the D&H had owned a slightly different route network?
The route network I am thinking of is what the D&H actually had but with a second main line running as follows:
Starting at their own terminal in NYC roughly where Grand Central is in real life and then runniing to Albany via Poughkeepsie where it takes the route the real D&H did up to Delson Juction and then over its own route to a Union Station in Montreal.
This route would obviously mean that the D&H would run the Laurentian and Montreal Limited entirely on their own tracks and also get a slice of the NY - Albany market and also have their own freight yard in New York. What I wonder is:
What effect would this extra track have had on the D&H?
Would the passenger trains been more profitable?
How would the freight service have worked out?
Could the D&H have got through the 70s/80s better?
Anyone got their own thoughts about this hypothetical route or even their own ideas for what might have been?
The route network I am thinking of is what the D&H actually had but with a second main line running as follows:
Starting at their own terminal in NYC roughly where Grand Central is in real life and then runniing to Albany via Poughkeepsie where it takes the route the real D&H did up to Delson Juction and then over its own route to a Union Station in Montreal.
This route would obviously mean that the D&H would run the Laurentian and Montreal Limited entirely on their own tracks and also get a slice of the NY - Albany market and also have their own freight yard in New York. What I wonder is:
What effect would this extra track have had on the D&H?
Would the passenger trains been more profitable?
How would the freight service have worked out?
Could the D&H have got through the 70s/80s better?
Anyone got their own thoughts about this hypothetical route or even their own ideas for what might have been?