by wicked
Seems like freight was also a consideration? Although I don’t think there are any customers on that stretch?
Railroad Forums
Moderators: sery2831, CRail
The EGE wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2024 3:57 pm*Wellesley Square may get temporary mini-high platforms within the next year or two. If the new temporary mini-highs they just installed at Beverly are deemed successful, they plan to built them at Wellesley Square, Franklin, Walpole, and West Medford pending full reconstructions of those stations.I thought construction of new mini-highs was verboten because of the state's extreme interpretation of ADA. Did that change, or was I misinformed somewhere along the way?
MBTA3247 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:30 pmThey're probably allowed if they're temporary, with a plan for a full high level platform to be put in its place.The EGE wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2024 3:57 pm*Wellesley Square may get temporary mini-high platforms within the next year or two. If the new temporary mini-highs they just installed at Beverly are deemed successful, they plan to built them at Wellesley Square, Franklin, Walpole, and West Medford pending full reconstructions of those stations.I thought construction of new mini-highs was verboten because of the state's extreme interpretation of ADA. Did that change, or was I misinformed somewhere along the way?
johnpbarlow wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 6:56 am Just a nit but given there is continuous fencing with no pedestrian crossing between tracks 1 and 2 at Natick Center, Wellesley Square, and Wellesley Hills, these stations all permit two T trains to stop simultaneously. Only W Natick and Wellesley Hills stations require patrons to cross track 2 on a pedestrian crossing to get on/off a T train stopping on track 1. Thus if a train is occupying track 2 at these two stations, access to a simultaneously arriving train on track 1 would be denied.I think you mean Wellesley Farms not Wellesley Hills. At Wellesley Hills there is no way to access the outbound platform without crossing the tracks.
diburning wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:10 amThe MAAB has been around (1978) before ADA (1990). (That's why the 1980s-opened Orange and Red Line stations are accessible.) Its rules are not an interpretation of federal rules; they're a separate and often stricter set. That's generally a good thing; it's why almost all the remaining narrow, substandard Green Line surface stops will be rebuilt with accessible, comfortable platforms over the next few years. Compare to SF, which doesn't plan to ever make most of its light rail stops accessible.MBTA3247 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:30 pmThey're probably allowed if they're temporary, with a plan for a full high level platform to be put in its place.The EGE wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2024 3:57 pm*Wellesley Square may get temporary mini-high platforms within the next year or two. If the new temporary mini-highs they just installed at Beverly are deemed successful, they plan to built them at Wellesley Square, Franklin, Walpole, and West Medford pending full reconstructions of those stations.I thought construction of new mini-highs was verboten because of the state's extreme interpretation of ADA. Did that change, or was I misinformed somewhere along the way?
The EGE wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2024 3:57 pm Two separate projects.The no-build option would be better than the disgraceful plans the T has proposed for the Newton stations. Auburndale and West Newton should be rebuildable using lots of ramps and no elevators, sorta like the Ashland to Grafton cheapskate stations. Leave space for future quartet of elevators - each elevator costs >$1M i think from reading documents several years ago. Newtonville Station can either be rebuilt with two side tracks or it is impossible depending on the minimum width of elevators and space allowed between the elevator and the track. Also interesting is the MBTA's obsession with pedestrian overpasses but never an underpass - probably for security reasons.
The third track project is to stretch from CP-11 in Weston to CP-21 just east of Framingham, a total of 10.2 miles. A new interlocking, CP-15, would be added just west of Wellesley Square. The four non-accessible stations on the segment - West Natick plus the three Wellesley stops* - would be rebuilt for the triple track with full-length high level platforms. A design contract was issued in June 2021, with projected design completion in mid-2025. Total construction costs were estimated in the $400M range, completion in late 2030.
Separately, the three Newton stations are planned for reconstruction. That project has been rather bumpy. The MBTA first presented designs with one platform, with no traffic modeling. That did not go over well. Then they started designing proper two-platform stations, but abruptly stopped in 2023 because the costs were out of control. The latest update has them planning 400-foot-long platforms - supposedly to save on cost - that won't be able to accommodate the length of trains that are normally run. That's not going over well either.