• Amtrak/LIRR Moynihan Train Hall

  • This forum will be for issues that don't belong specifically to one NYC area transit agency, but several. For instance, intra-MTA proposals or MTA-wide issues, which may involve both Metro-North Railroad (MNRR) and the Long Island Railroad (LIRR). Other intra-agency examples: through running such as the now discontinued MNRR-NJT Meadowlands special. Topics which only concern one operating agency should remain in their respective forums.
This forum will be for issues that don't belong specifically to one NYC area transit agency, but several. For instance, intra-MTA proposals or MTA-wide issues, which may involve both Metro-North Railroad (MNRR) and the Long Island Railroad (LIRR). Other intra-agency examples: through running such as the now discontinued MNRR-NJT Meadowlands special. Topics which only concern one operating agency should remain in their respective forums.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, FL9AC, Jeff Smith

  by Backshophoss
 
That's a NY Times Editorial piece,but it seems to be the best way to restore/and cleanup the platforms
at track level,and removing some of the supports that were added when MSG was built.
  by Greg Moore
 
I REALLY like this idea!
(except it definitely needs doors. Sorry, but the crosswinds would suck).
  by AgentSkelly
 
Yeah, I like the idea too...its like ironic to make MSG actually apart of the station.....
  by Gilbert B Norman
 
As Mr. Backshop immrdiately notes, Gray Lady speaks:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/01/opini ... ation.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fair Use:
Unless you are among the commuters whose souls are crushed there every workday, it’s hard to know what a dreadful place Penn Station is, how the waiting areas are mosh pits, the platforms are cattle chutes, the low ceiling tiles are encrusted with grimy stalactites and, in heavy rains, water pours from the ceiling into rolling garbage bins
Gotta say, she has been consistent with her view for the past 50 years. Also gotta say. the Dolans certainly have "chips on the table and ready to put them in play" both at City Hall and up in Albany - and they want MSG right where it is.
Last edited by Gilbert B Norman on Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
  by jstolberg
 
The MSG lightbox idea is a little sterile for me. How about adding a 1500 room hotel, a destination conference center, and nightclubs themed for each of the world's continents somewhere in all that empty volume? You could fit that in and still have plenty of natural light and air.
  by andegold
 
These renderings make it a little difficult to fully grasp what would be going on under the current footprint of MSG. It looks like they would eliminate the upper level concourse almost entirely and move all passengers, arriving and departing to what is now the mezzanine. In these drawings it looks like arriving passengers will only be able to avail themselves of the current mezzanine level stairs and escalators plus the new west end stairs. Then once at the new concourse level arriving passengers from all trains will use common sets of stairs from this new concourse to either the street or the new waiting area on Eighth Ave. I also like how the Times has, willingly or not, joined the partisan nature of the project. They mention total daily passenger count at the station but when you add up the Amtrak and LIRR counts they of course come up short compared to the total because they leave out the subway and, more importantly, NJ Transit. New York State wouldn't contribute to NJT's proposed tunnels because they wouldn't serve NY citizens (even though they would bring in tens of thousands of sales and income tax paying visitors and employees everyday). It wouldn't surprise me one bit if Amtrak and even LIRR deliberately tried to force NJT riders to use only the Seventh Avenue concourse. However, let's take a real world example of track management currently: If an Amtrak and NJT departure are both currently scheduled for the same platform Amtrak ushers will not allow NJT riders down certain escalators, even if all other escalators in the vicinity are running up, forcing those passengers to run from the Eighth Avenue concourse to the Seventh Avenue concourse to get down to track level.
  by Jeff Smith
 
2016-07-14_Penn-Track-Diagram-01-645x242.jpg
Interesting thoughts on through running: The Architect's Newspaper

Brief, fair-use quote follows. Images from Rethink NY.Penn’s present configuration makes through-running impossible because only two tracks connect to Penn from New Jersey, while four tracks connect to the station from Queens. Amtrak’s current Gateway proposal would remedy this by building two additional tracks between Penn and New Jersey.
Penn Station proposals fail to recognize unique opportunity to improve regional transit
...
Understanding Penn’s capacity limitations (and how to solve them) is critical to a good design. They exist in three forms: passenger crowding, train traffic, and systematic connectivity issues to the rest of the region. On a passenger level, overcrowding is mitigated through staged boarding, or letting passengers onto the tracks only after trains arrive and unload. This produces chaotic lines and rushed transfers, especially in the area of the station that NJ Transit uses. Images of Governor Cuomo and PAU’s proposals suggest that the platform width and vertical access would both remain unchanged in the new Penn Station. Preserving existing stairs to the platform level, as PAU proposes, is not enough; Penn needs more vertical access. Rather than working to preserve inadequate stairwells to the platform level, we should be fighting for more stairs and escalators.

On a track level, the station is also hopelessly congested. Incoming trains often have to wait in tunnels for ten minutes or more as other trains exit the station. This is because the station is operated primarily as a terminal rather than a through station. Trains must cross each other as they enter and leave the station. Through-running avoids this problem by scheduling eastbound traffic on southern tracks and westbound traffic on northern tracks. Each train could enter the station, unload and load passengers, and continue on without ever crossing oncoming traffic.

Penn’s present configuration makes through-running impossible because only two tracks connect to Penn from New Jersey, while four tracks connect to the station from Queens. Amtrak’s current Gateway proposal would remedy this by building two additional tracks between Penn and New Jersey.
...
Not sure I agree with a couple of the premises. One, crossing traffic is tough to avoid given the fact that trains are coming from three different directions. Two, through running is not impossible, just difficult. The Harold project will help solve that. It's arriving and departing traffic, and the west side yard that are tough.

Some of the other proposals actual reduce track capacity by widening or extending platforms. Not sure what to make of that.

The article also doesn't address the the varying styles of equipment. Amtrak is all overhead (except for Empire); NJT is also overhead; LIRR (and potentially MNRR) would be DC. Through running would require LIRR to have M8 style equipment; I'm not even sure the MNRR M8's are capable of running on the catenary west of NYP.

Anyway, I know some of these "rethink" proposals have been dismissed as unrealistic. This one seems thought provoking.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
  by jp1822
 
Gilbert B Norman wrote:As Mr. Backshop immrdiately notes, Gray Lady speaks:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/01/opini ... ation.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fair Use:
Unless you are among the commuters whose souls are crushed there every workday, it’s hard to know what a dreadful place Penn Station is, how the waiting areas are mosh pits, the platforms are cattle chutes, the low ceiling tiles are encrusted with grimy stalactites and, in heavy rains, water pours from the ceiling into rolling garbage bins
Gotta say, she has been consistent with her view for the past 50 years. Also gotta say. the Dolans certainly have "chips on the table and ready to put them in play" both at City Hall and up in Albany - and they want MSG right where it is.
And down on the platforms - it's no picnic. Ever take a look "up." If you do you may get some stuff in your eyes instead of just on your hair. It's a grimy cavern down there and as much as Amtrak has tried to put some lipstick on the escalator chutes, you know the rest of the story! The 8th Ave. subway pounds through and shakes the dust and dirt pretty well! To think this is the "gateway" to one of the "greatest cities" in the country (and to some the world) - this is not a good introduction if you step OFF the train. And during rush hour, you better make sure you stay on the platform and keep moving in the mosh pile. Look out for that other "incoming train" on the adjacent track! Why the depths of NYP couldn't have been more like 30th Street Station is somewhat baffling to me.
  by Backshophoss
 
Just about the only "cure" for NY Penn is to REMOVE MSG off the station,that would allow removal of the supports
at platform level that were sunk thru.
If and when the "Gateway" tunnels are built,that should help with the station's thru-put of trains,then the limting factor
becomes Sunnyside Yard's size and abilty to service trains.
A total reconfiguration of the platforms as a thru type station may not be possible,the current traffic levels make
it hard to allow sections at track level to taken out of service for rebuilding,there should be a way to use the mail
platform to allow NJT to at least discharge passengers there during peak rush hour times in the AM and load
during PM Peak rush hour times
  by adamj023
 
Has the West End concourse project been completed yet or how close is it to being done?

Will definitely be a positive step considering the vast majority of tracks will be accessible with a lot more room that is sorely needed for people movement. Also I suspect the new Amtrak display boards will have been redone as well.

Penn Station is a mess but the new concourse will be a nice first step and after that other projects will hopefully commence. We have a first rate city but some horrible infrastructure.
  by EuroStar
 
To the casual observer the expansion of the West End Concourse seems complete or almost complete. The extra space in the corridor under the A,C and E subway tracks has been open for at least a couple of weeks. The wider and extended Concourse is still behind tarp with "Skanka" written all over it. Does anyone know when the concourse is supposed to open? Any unofficial (or official) word what is holding things up?
  • 1
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 80