b&m 1566 wrote:Did NHN or interested customers (ie. Colemans) ever respond to the states RFP for the Conway Branch? We know GER did.
No. That sand pit Madison customer NHN wants is on the OOS trackage, which requires moving forward on the Conway Branch Restoration Study recs before there's even a basis for issuing an operator RFP. An RFP for Ossippee-North Conway would be worthless absent any action on that all-important prerequisite step.
Given how intensely specialized NHN is on handling aggregates traffic, even if they were interested in exploring non-contiguous operating rights there's nothing up there that remotely fits their business model unless it involves going through Madison first. The BS&G majority stake in the railroad establishes some pretty cut-and-dried boundaries for how far they'd be willing to stick their necks out to dabble in speculative business. They're a parasitic appendage to BS&G that's common-carier in name only. NHN's prospects for growth in non- sand/gravel carloads comes from shooting free throws everywhere they can in-between pickups at the monster sand pits...something they're starting to do a bit more of on the existing mainline. But for genuine expansion territory, "Madison or bust" is pretty much the only way the BS&G overlords would see any point behind putting out feelers for those RFP's. It would take an infusion of new minority investors jumping in because they want to push for more common carrier / non- BS&G-serving business to really change NHN's business calculus.