Moderator: MEC407
guilford88panam wrote:Today at Rigby yard I happened to catch the 690 the 621 and the 643 all in the same consist with a gp40 assembled and looking like they where about to leave with a train to up north. I have some pictures and a video if people want to see them.
tom18287 wrote:whats wrong with them?
NV290 wrote:Those three units often work as a team, and as a team, they are near worthless!
Last i heard, the 690 drops it's load constantly and the 643 and 621 don't load above 10mph reliably, and even when they do, they dont make transition. It's sad, considering those three units should be the best pullers on the property, when in fact, they are the worst.
But seeing SD26's on a mainline railroad in 2009 is cool anyhow....


MEC407 wrote:The GP35s are even older, if you consider that they were never upgraded the way the SD24s were. The SD24s received a lot of upgrades to bring them up to mid-'70s standards, whereas the GP35s are all pretty much original, dating back to 1963. Those units, from what I hear, are gutless wonders and no longer make transition either.
Guilford's S.O.P. has always been to obtain motive power as inexpensively as is humanly possible, maintain it absolutely minimally, and run it until it dies. In some ways it makes sense, but it definitely isn't conducive to getting trains over the road in a timely fashion. Which has never been their forte even when they've had halfway decent power available to them.
Dick H wrote:Run this URL http://photos.nerail.org/search/
In the first block under "Simple Search", type in 690
You will get dozens of photos of the trains with the 690 in the consist.
Sometimes it will be leading, but often times not.
Dick
KSmitty wrote:Why has Pan Am allowed their six axle fleet to fall apart while they are so strapped for power. Isnt maintaining your own fleet of power cheaper than leasing?

Return to Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests